Multi-window reconciliation

Not automatable Finance Correlation key: statement_ref · 86.2%

Worked by hand — 2.9 h/week across everyone who runs it — and NOT recommended for automation: Redesign, not a bot.

Case footprint: median 3.3 h elapsed, 32m 27s of it hands-on, across 1 work session and 0.1 calendar days. 16 of the 16 happy-path waits exceed the 150 s idle-gap threshold, but a gap only ends a work session when it outlasts one (59 min, the fleet's mean). None here do: the case is put down and picked up inside the same sitting, while the person works other cases.

Cases: 88
Activities: 18
Variants: 36
Median throughput: 3.3 h
p95 throughput: 14.5 h
Working time / Waiting time: 32m 27s / 2.8 h
Rework: 31%
Fitness: 0.81
Precision: 0.58

No filters — showing every case

88 of 88 cases (100%)

Directly-follows map

Discovered from the event log. The editable automation design is the last tab.

showing 18 of 18 activities · 100% of activity instances covered

Geometry is computed at build time, so nothing reflows when you filter. 63 of 103 directly-follows relations sit below the 0.20 noise threshold and are hidden; together they carry 5.9% of transitions.

Node fill 0–20%20–40%40–60%60–80%80–100% Happy path Loop back Self-loop

Five discrete steps. Edge thickness is a square-root scale on frequency, so the busiest edge is 8 px and the quietest 1 px.

Where the hours go

Edges ranked by total recoverable waiting time, not mean.

6.7% working 93.3% waiting · mean 16m 02s · p95 54m 31s · 84 cases affected · 7.7% of total cycle time
10.9% working 89.1% waiting · mean 14m 41s · p95 49m 55s · 76 cases affected · 6.4% of total cycle time
6.3% working 93.7% waiting · mean 12m 08s · p95 41m 15s · 88 cases affected · 6.1% of total cycle time
10.8% working 89.2% waiting · mean 10m 28s · p95 35m 35s · 84 cases affected · 5% of total cycle time
4.5% working 95.5% waiting · mean 10m 12s · p95 34m 41s · 83 cases affected · 4.9% of total cycle time
4.1% working 95.9% waiting · mean 11m 06s · p95 37m 44s · 77 cases affected · 4.9% of total cycle time
7.9% working 92.1% waiting · mean 9m 58s · p95 33m 53s · 84 cases affected · 4.9% of total cycle time
9.8% working 90.2% waiting · mean 10m 35s · p95 35m 59s · 73 cases affected · 4.4% of total cycle time

Variant explorer

One row per distinct end-to-end activity sequence, ranked by case count. Row 1 is the happy path and every other row is column-aligned to it, so deviations read as vertical discontinuities.

Top 12 variants cover 72.7% of cases.

Select exactly two variants to compare.

#	Variant	Sequence	Cases	% of cases	Cumulative	Median	p95	Steps	Δ vs happy path	Conformance	Compare
1	V-01 Happy path	OWEXDFAWVLMLVTCVPVCEFDCMFXSLFR	18	20.5%	20.5%	2.6 h	19.9 h	15	—	Conforming	Compare V-01
2	V-02	OWEXDFAWVLMLVTCVPVCEFDCMFXSLFR	7	8%	28.5%	1.9 h	10.8 h	14	-1 · -43m 58s	Deviating	Compare V-02
3	V-03	OWOSEXDFCNAWVLMLVTCNSWCVPVCEFDCMFXSLFR	6	6.8%	35.3%	4.2 h	15 h	19	+4 · 1.6 h	Deviating	Compare V-03
4	V-04	OWEXDFAWVLMLVTCVPVCEFDCMFXSLFR	6	6.8%	42.1%	2.5 h	13.8 h	14	-1 · -3m 34s	Deviating	Compare V-04
5	V-05	OWEXDFAWVLMLVTCVPV^×3CEFDCMFXSLFR	5	5.7%	47.8%	2.2 h	11.2 h	15	—	Deviating	Compare V-05
6	V-06	SWOWEXDFAWSWVLMLVTCVPVCEFDCMFXSLFR	4	4.5%	52.3%	2.5 h	10.2 h	16	+1 · -7m 46s	Deviating	Compare V-06
7	V-07	EXOW^×2EXDF^×2AWVLMLVTCVPVCEFDCMFXSLFR	4	4.5%	56.8%	4 h	20.9 h	18	+3 · 83m 49s	Conforming	Compare V-07
8	V-08	OWEXOSDFAWCNVLMLVTCVPVCEFDCMFXSLFR	4	4.5%	61.3%	2.9 h	18 h	16	+1 · 16m 03s	Deviating	Compare V-08
9	V-09	OWEXDFAW^×2VLML^×3VTCVPVCEFDCMFXSLFR	3	3.4%	64.7%	3.2 h	15.8 h	18	+3 · 34m 04s	Conforming	Compare V-09
10	V-10	OWEXDFAWVLML^×2VTCVPVCEFDCMFXSLFR	3	3.4%	68.1%	3.3 h	21.1 h	17	+2 · 40m 14s	Conforming	Compare V-10
11	V-11	OWEXDF^×2AWVLMLVTCVPVCEFDCMFXSLFR	2	2.3%	70.4%	2.5 h	12.4 h	16	+1 · -7m 11s	Deviating	Compare V-11
12	V-12	OWEXDFAWVLMLVTCVPVCEFDCMFXSLFR	2	2.3%	72.7%	3 h	23.2 h	16	+1 · 22m 30s	Deviating	Compare V-12
—	Other variants (12) · 13.6% of cases	Activity sequence —	12	13.6%	100%	—	—	—	—	—

24 variants (66.7% of all variants) occur exactly once, together 27.3% of cases.

Variant distribution

Rank on a log scale against cases on a log scale, with cumulative coverage on the right axis.

Cases (log scale) Cumulative coverage (%) Variant rank (log scale) 19 variants cover 80% of cases

Variant comparison

Two variants on the same alignment columns. Colour says which side; hatching repeats it, so the diff survives greyscale.

Variant A

Variant B

A · V-01

Merged activity set

B · V-02

Merged activity set

Every alignment column, coloured by which side uses it.

In both Only in A Only in B In neither

List of changes

Side by side
Side by side	A	B	Δ

Attributes associated with each branch

These are associations measured on the log, not causes. Every rule prints the number of cases it was measured on.

Bank `statement_bank`

85 of 88 cases · 3.5% missing

Banc Meridià34 · 38.6%
Caixa Ponent24 · 27.3%
Nordbank AG16 · 18.2%
Atlantic Union11 · 12.5%

Rule statements

Ranked by lift × support. Each rule is a sentence you can read aloud.

When currency = GBP → the case takes “Open the supplier record” in 30% of cases (baseline 13.6%, lift 2.21×, n = 23).
30% confidence 13.6% baseline 2.21× lift n = 23
When period_end = true AND shift = Late → the case takes “Contact the vendor” in 58.4% of cases (baseline 14.8%, lift 3.95×, n = 10).
58.4% confidence 14.8% baseline 3.95× lift n = 10
When amount_band = > €50k → the case takes “Open the supplier record” in 30.8% of cases (baseline 13.6%, lift 2.26×, n = 17).
30.8% confidence 13.6% baseline 2.26× lift n = 17
When fx_difference = true AND amount_band = > €50k → the case takes “Contact the vendor” in 49% of cases (baseline 14.8%, lift 3.31×, n = 9).
49% confidence 14.8% baseline 3.31× lift n = 9
When statement_bank = Caixa Ponent AND line_items > 33 → the case takes “Contact the vendor” in 51.4% of cases (baseline 14.8%, lift 3.47×, n = 8).
51.4% confidence 14.8% baseline 3.47× lift n = 8
When line_items > 33 → the case takes “Open the supplier record” in 30.1% of cases (baseline 13.6%, lift 2.21×, n = 8).
30.1% confidence 13.6% baseline 2.21× lift n = 8

Decision point

Pick an exclusive choice in the map to see its branch shares and the attributes that discriminate between them.

Decision point

Branch

Download file66 · 83.5%
Align two windows side by side6 · 7.6%
Open workbook5 · 6.3%
Open the supplier record5 · 6.3%

Pick an exclusive choice in the map to see its branch shares and the attributes that discriminate between them.

Conformance against the reference model

Reference model v3, 24 Jun 2026

Fitness0.81

Precision0.58

Fitness and precision trade off; we report both rather than a single model-quality score.

Conforming cases — 31 (35.2%) Non-conforming — 57 (64.8%)

Deviations by type

A deviation is not necessarily an error — it is behaviour the reference model does not allow.

					Breaks conformance
Activity retry	28	31.8%	3m 59s	1.9 h	—
Skip	44	50%	2m 14s	1.6 h	Breaks conformance
Invalid activity	39	44.3%	2m 17s	89m 03s	Breaks conformance
Loop back	12	13.6%	3m 38s	43m 36s	—
Exclusive-choice violation	8	9.1%	2m 31s	20m 08s	Breaks conformance
Invalid start/end	5	5.7%	0s	0s	Breaks conformance

Conforming cases over the window

Conforming cases (%) · 16 Jun – 13 Jul 2026

Conforming cases (%)16 Jun – 13 Jul 2026

Rework and loops

Self-loops and loop-backs, with loop inflow, outflow and net gain.

Activity	Kind	Self-loops	Cases affected	Mean repeats	Loop in	Loop out	Net gain	Total waiting
Paste into the target field	Self-loop	20	8	3.5×	20	20	0	1.7 h
Download file	Self-loop	10	7	2.43×	10	8	+2	33m 31s
Request export	Loop back	0	6	2×	6	6	0	3.7 h
Align two windows side by side	Loop back	0	6	2×	6	6	0	2 h
Copy values between windows	Loop back	0	6	2×	6	6	0	2 h
Open workbook	Loop back	0	5	2×	5	5	0	2.6 h
Open workbook	Loop back	0	5	2×	5	5	0	3 h
Download file	Loop back	0	5	2×	5	5	0	1.8 h

Rework cost €568–852 · 27 cases · 28 h Costed at the €25/h loaded rate used everywhere in this dashboard.

Cases

Showing 16 of a 40-case sample drawn from 88 cases, across the 24 variants listed on the Variants tab. The totals above are exact; this table is sampled.

Variant				Roles	Departments		Conformance
V-01	2026-07-10 14:10:26	3.4 h	15	Financial Controller	finance	0	Conforming
V-05	2026-07-10 10:57:44	7.2 h	15	Invoicing ClerkTreasury Analyst	financebackoffice	2	Deviating
V-01	2026-07-10 09:46:16	3.8 h	15	Financial ControllerInvoicing Clerk	financebackoffice	0	Conforming
V-01	2026-07-09 13:11:01	15.3 h	15	Financial ControllerTreasury Analyst	financebackoffice	0	Conforming
V-03	2026-07-09 08:21:46	2.1 h	19	Treasury AnalystFinancial Controller	finance	1	Deviating
V-01	2026-07-07 16:17:47	8.3 h	15	Financial ControllerTreasury Analyst	financebackoffice	0	Conforming
V-02	2026-07-07 11:26:23	3.3 h	14	Financial Controller	financebackoffice	0	Deviating
V-05	2026-07-07 09:01:41	88m 11s	15	Financial ControllerInvoicing Clerk	financebackoffice	2	Deviating
V-14	2026-07-03 16:18:01	8.1 h	15	Treasury AnalystInvoicing Clerk	finance	0	Deviating
V-01	2026-07-02 10:53:01	10.6 h	15	Treasury AnalystFinancial Controller	finance	0	Conforming
V-01	2026-07-02 09:55:36	4.7 h	15	Invoicing ClerkFinancial Controller	finance	0	Conforming
V-02	2026-07-02 08:18:29	3.1 h	14	Invoicing Clerk	finance	0	Deviating
V-11	2026-07-01 12:56:16	2.5 h	16	Financial ControllerTreasury Analyst	financebackoffice	2	Deviating
V-08	2026-06-30 16:53:44	2.4 h	16	Invoicing Clerk	financebackoffice	0	Deviating
V-09	2026-06-30 12:29:36	8.5 h	18	Treasury AnalystFinancial Controller	financebackoffice	3	Conforming
V-06	2026-06-30 10:46:18	4.5 h	16	Treasury AnalystFinancial Controller	finance	1	Deviating

16 of 40

Not automatable 79% confidence

Automation design

The Map tab is what the event log shows. This is the automation you are designing from it.

ExcelERP clientSAP (web)

2.9h reclaimed / week across everyone who runs it

Case V-01 Conforming

—

· Process: Multi-window reconciliation · Correlation key statement_ref

Total duration

Working Waiting Steps · Rework

Field	Value
`statement_ref`	STM-2026-87688
`supplier`	Atlas Papeleria SA
`amount_eur`	€41,425.02
`cost_centre`	CC-1548
`vat_code`	S13
`iban`	ES•• •••• •••• •••• 8336 · masked at capture (IBAN masked at capture)

Field	Value
`statement_ref`	STM-2026-24390
`supplier`	Atlas Papeleria SA
`amount_eur`	€30,147.22
`cost_centre`	CC-1841
`vat_code`	S13
`iban`	ES•• •••• •••• •••• 7235 · masked at capture (IBAN masked at capture)

Field	Value
`statement_ref`	STM-2026-77975
`supplier`	Havensmark Trading NV
`amount_eur`	€45,535.52
`cost_centre`	CC-3330
`vat_code`	S10
`iban`	ES•• •••• •••• •••• 5129 · masked at capture (IBAN masked at capture)