Scheduled report delivery

Live Operations Correlation key: report_ref · 98.2%

Live Automated since Dec 2025 — 2.2 h/week reclaimed across everyone who runs it, 71 h to date. 0 h/week of hands-on work is left, and that is the figure quoted everywhere on this page.

Case footprint: median 38m 20s elapsed, 6m 05s of it hands-on, across 1 work session and 0.1 calendar days. 3 of the 6 happy-path waits exceed the 150 s idle-gap threshold, but a gap only ends a work session when it outlasts one (59 min, the fleet's mean). None here do: the case is put down and picked up inside the same sitting, while the person works other cases.

Cases: 121
Activities: 7
Variants: 23
Median throughput: 38m 20s
p95 throughput: 2.5 h
Working time / Waiting time: 6m 05s / 32m 15s
Rework: 8%
Fitness: 0.94
Precision: 0.83

No filters — showing every case

121 of 121 cases (100%)

Directly-follows map

Discovered from the event log. The editable automation design is the last tab.

showing 7 of 7 activities · 100% of activity instances covered

Geometry is computed at build time, so nothing reflows when you filter. All 31 directly-follows relations are shown.

Node fill 0–20%20–40%40–60%60–80%80–100% Happy path Loop back Self-loop

Five discrete steps. Edge thickness is a square-root scale on frequency, so the busiest edge is 8 px and the quietest 1 px.

Variant explorer

One row per distinct end-to-end activity sequence, ranked by case count. Row 1 is the happy path and every other row is column-aligned to it, so deviations read as vertical discontinuities.

Top 12 variants cover 90.9% of cases.

Select exactly two variants to compare.

#	Variant	Sequence	Cases	% of cases	Cumulative	Median	p95	Steps	Δ vs happy path	Conformance	Compare
1	V-01 Happy path	FSBSDODFFD	48	39.7%	39.7%	31m 05s	2.2 h	5	—	Conforming	Compare V-01
2	V-02	FSBSDOAF^×2DFAFFD	11	9.1%	48.8%	45m 57s	5 h	7	+2 · 14m 52s	Deviating	Compare V-02
3	V-03	FSAF^×2BS^×3DOBSDFFD	9	7.4%	56.2%	56m 29s	6.8 h	9	+4 · 25m 24s	Deviating	Compare V-03
4	V-04	FS^×3BSDODFFD	8	6.6%	62.8%	41m 46s	4 h	7	+2 · 10m 41s	Conforming	Compare V-04
5	V-05	FSBSDOAFDFFD^×3	7	5.8%	68.6%	52m 42s	5.9 h	8	+3 · 21m 37s	Deviating	Compare V-05
6	V-06	RBFSBSDOAFDFRBFD	6	5%	73.6%	53m 23s	6 h	8	+3 · 22m 18s	Deviating	Compare V-06
7	V-07	FSBSDODFFD	5	4.1%	77.7%	24m 43s	2.6 h	4	-1 · -6m 22s	Deviating	Compare V-07
8	V-08	FSBSDODFAFFD	5	4.1%	81.8%	32m 35s	2.1 h	6	+1 · 1m 30s	Deviating	Compare V-08
9	V-09	FSBSDODFAFFD	4	3.3%	85.1%	35m 39s	2.8 h	5	—	Deviating	Compare V-09
10	V-10	FSBSDOAFDFFD	3	2.5%	87.6%	32m 56s	4.1 h	6	+1 · 1m 51s	Deviating	Compare V-10
11	V-11	FSBSDOAFDFFD	3	2.5%	90.1%	30m 45s	2.7 h	5	—	Deviating	Compare V-11
12	V-12	FSBS^×3DODFFD	1	0.8%	90.9%	37m	3.7 h	7	+2 · 5m 55s	Conforming	Compare V-12
—	Other variants (0) · 0% of cases	Activity sequence —	0	0%	100%	—	—	—	—	—

12 variants (52.2% of all variants) occur exactly once, together 9.9% of cases.

Variant distribution

Rank on a log scale against cases on a log scale, with cumulative coverage on the right axis.

Cases (log scale) Cumulative coverage (%) Variant rank (log scale) 8 variants cover 80% of cases

Variant comparison

Two variants on the same alignment columns. Colour says which side; hatching repeats it, so the diff survives greyscale.

Variant A

Variant B

A · V-01

Merged activity set

B · V-02

Merged activity set

Every alignment column, coloured by which side uses it.

In both Only in A Only in B In neither

List of changes

Side by side
Side by side	A	B	Δ

Attributes associated with each branch

These are associations measured on the log, not causes. Every rule prints the number of cases it was measured on.

Schedule window `schedule_window`

116 of 121 cases · 4.4% missing

Off-hours58 · 47.9%
Business hours36 · 29.8%
On demand22 · 18.2%

Rule statements

Ranked by lift × support. Each rule is a sentence you can read aloud.

When report_size_mb > 29.2 → the case takes “Retry the failed build” in 30.1% of cases (baseline 8.3%, lift 3.63×, n = 8).
30.1% confidence 8.3% baseline 3.63× lift n = 8
When schedule_window = On demand AND period_end = true → the case takes “Alert Ops about the failure” in 92% of cases (baseline 43%, lift 2.14×, n = 12).
92% confidence 43% baseline 2.14× lift n = 12
When department = Finance AND shift = Afternoon → the case takes “Alert Ops about the failure” in 78.3% of cases (baseline 43%, lift 1.82×, n = 8).
78.3% confidence 43% baseline 1.82× lift n = 8

Decision point

Pick an exclusive choice in the map to see its branch shares and the attributes that discriminate between them.

Decision point

Branch

File the document8 · 80%
Schedule fires6 · 60%
Build the report on the server1 · 10%
Alert Ops about the failure1 · 10%
Download file1 · 10%

Pick an exclusive choice in the map to see its branch shares and the attributes that discriminate between them.

Conformance against the reference model

Reference model v3, 29 Jun 2026

Fitness0.94

Precision0.83

Fitness and precision trade off; we report both rather than a single model-quality score.

Conforming cases — 59 (48.8%) Non-conforming — 62 (51.2%)

Deviations by type

A deviation is not necessarily an error — it is behaviour the reference model does not allow.

					Breaks conformance
Activity retry	42	34.7%	4m 08s	2.9 h	—
Invalid activity	62	51.2%	78s	80m 36s	Breaks conformance
Skip	44	36.4%	76s	55m 44s	Breaks conformance
Exclusive-choice violation	9	7.4%	88s	13m 12s	Breaks conformance
Invalid start/end	6	5%	0s	0s	Breaks conformance

Conforming cases over the window

Conforming cases (%) · 16 Jun – 13 Jul 2026

Conforming cases (%)16 Jun – 13 Jul 2026

Rework and loops

Self-loops and loop-backs, with loop inflow, outflow and net gain.

Activity	Kind	Self-loops	Cases affected	Mean repeats	Loop in	Loop out	Net gain	Total waiting
Alert Ops about the failure	Self-loop	32	21	2.52×	32	27	+5	20m 45s
File the document	Loop back	0	20	2×	20	20	0	5 h
Download file	Loop back	0	20	2×	20	17	+3	5.3 h
Build the report on the server	Loop back	0	11	2×	11	8	+3	54m 29s
Build the report on the server	Self-loop	29	10	3.9×	29	30	-1	62m 08s
Schedule fires	Self-loop	20	10	3×	20	16	+4	40m 14s
File the document	Self-loop	18	9	3×	18	16	+2	9m 46s
File the document	Loop back	0	8	2×	8	7	+1	37m 43s

Rework cost €152–228 · 10 cases · 8 h Costed at the €25/h loaded rate used everywhere in this dashboard.

Cases

Showing 16 of a 40-case sample drawn from 121 cases, across the 23 variants listed on the Variants tab. The totals above are exact; this table is sampled.

Variant				Roles	Departments		Conformance
V-01	2026-07-10 13:49:45	31m 31s	5	Operations AnalystSupport Lead	opssupport	0	Conforming
V-01	2026-07-10 12:43:11	41m 48s	5	Operations AnalystSupport Lead	ops	0	Conforming
V-06	2026-07-10 11:42:57	10m 41s	8	Support LeadOperations Analyst	ops	1	Deviating
V-02	2026-07-10 11:27:35	1.7 h	7	Support LeadOperations Analyst	opssupport	2	Deviating
V-01	2026-07-10 10:16:22	22m 16s	5	Support Lead	opssupport	0	Conforming
V-01	2026-07-10 10:13:48	32m 27s	5	Support LeadOperations Analyst	opssupport	0	Conforming
V-01	2026-07-10 09:03:19	1.7 h	5	Support Lead	ops	0	Conforming
V-06	2026-07-09 13:18:13	29m 50s	8	Operations AnalystSupport Lead	opssupport	1	Deviating
V-01	2026-07-09 08:43:55	85m 06s	5	Operations AnalystSupport Lead	ops	0	Conforming
V-07	2026-07-08 14:46:28	9m 31s	4	Operations Analyst	ops	0	Deviating
V-01	2026-07-07 16:46:58	27m 02s	5	Support Lead	ops	0	Conforming
V-09	2026-07-07 09:32:02	54m 07s	5	Operations AnalystSupport Lead	opssupport	0	Deviating
V-01	2026-07-06 16:43:31	38m 35s	5	Support LeadOperations Analyst	opssupport	0	Conforming
V-03	2026-07-06 14:30:25	34m 19s	9	Support LeadOperations Analyst	opssupport	4	Deviating
V-01	2026-07-06 12:11:05	68m 20s	5	Support LeadOperations Analyst	opssupport	0	Conforming
V-14	2026-07-06 12:10:55	35m 33s	7	Support Lead	opssupport	1	Deviating

16 of 40

Live 97% confidence

Automation design

The Map tab is what the event log shows. This is the automation you are designing from it.

ERP clientCRM (web)Outlook

2.2h reclaimed / week across everyone who runs it

Case V-01 Conforming

—

· Process: Scheduled report delivery · Correlation key report_ref

Total duration

Working Waiting Steps · Rework

Field	Value
`report_ref`	RPT-2026-75837
`account`	Nordvant Components BV
`amount_eur`	€26,230.47
`region`	Iberia
`owner_role`	Sales Ops
`contact_phone`	+34 ••• ••• 643 · masked at capture (Phone number masked at capture)

Field	Value
`report_ref`	RPT-2026-20237
`account`	Brightline Media Srl
`amount_eur`	€30,299.54
`region`	Nordics
`owner_role`	Sales Ops
`contact_phone`	+34 ••• ••• 882 · masked at capture (Phone number masked at capture)

Field	Value
`report_ref`	RPT-2026-87877
`account`	Brightline Media Srl
`amount_eur`	€42,303.59
`region`	DACH
`owner_role`	Sales Ops
`contact_phone`	+34 ••• ••• 363 · masked at capture (Phone number masked at capture)