New-hire welcome sequence

Live People & HR Correlation key: employee_ref · 97.1%

Live Automated since Mar 2026 — 1.2 h/week reclaimed across everyone who runs it, 23 h to date. 0 h/week of hands-on work is left, and that is the figure quoted everywhere on this page.

Case footprint: median 1.6 h elapsed, 5m 04s of it hands-on, across 1 work session and 0.1 calendar days. 6 of the 6 happy-path waits exceed the 150 s idle-gap threshold, but a gap only ends a work session when it outlasts one (59 min, the fleet's mean). None here do: the case is put down and picked up inside the same sitting, while the person works other cases.

Cases: 84
Activities: 8
Variants: 21
Median throughput: 1.6 h
p95 throughput: 7.4 h
Working time / Waiting time: 5m 04s / 1.5 h
Rework: 9%
Fitness: 0.93
Precision: 0.81

No filters — showing every case

84 of 84 cases (100%)

Directly-follows map

Discovered from the event log. The editable automation design is the last tab.

showing 8 of 8 activities · 100% of activity instances covered

Geometry is computed at build time, so nothing reflows when you filter. All 39 directly-follows relations are shown.

Node fill 0–20%20–40%40–60%60–80%80–100% Happy path Loop back Self-loop

Five discrete steps. Edge thickness is a square-root scale on frequency, so the busiest edge is 8 px and the quietest 1 px.

Variant explorer

One row per distinct end-to-end activity sequence, ranked by case count. Row 1 is the happy path and every other row is column-aligned to it, so deviations read as vertical discontinuities.

Top 12 variants cover 89.4% of cases.

Select exactly two variants to compare.

#	Variant	Sequence	Cases	% of cases	Cumulative	Median	p95	Steps	Δ vs happy path	Conformance	Compare
1	V-01 Happy path	ORPESESOAS	30	35.7%	35.7%	73m 54s	4.9 h	5	—	Conforming	Compare V-01
2	V-02	ORPETYSESOAS	9	10.7%	46.4%	87m	10.2 h	6	+1 · 13m 06s	Deviating	Compare V-02
3	V-03	ORTYPESESOAS^×4	7	8.3%	54.7%	2.2 h	10 h	9	+4 · 59m 13s	Deviating	Compare V-03
4	V-04	ORPEPC^×3SEPCSOAS	6	7.1%	61.8%	2.3 h	9.6 h	8	+3 · 64m 15s	Deviating	Compare V-04
5	V-05	ORPESE^×2SOAS	5	6%	67.8%	1.5 h	8.1 h	6	+1 · 17m 52s	Conforming	Compare V-05
6	V-06	PCORPESEPCASSOAS^×2	5	6%	73.8%	2.3 h	9.5 h	8	+3 · 63m 32s	Deviating	Compare V-06
7	V-07	ORTYPESESOAS	4	4.8%	78.6%	1.6 h	9.7 h	6	+1 · 19m 19s	Deviating	Compare V-07
8	V-08	ORPESENHSOAS	3	3.6%	82.2%	84m 43s	11 h	6	+1 · 10m 49s	Deviating	Compare V-08
9	V-09	ORPESENHSOAS	3	3.6%	85.8%	1.5 h	10.6 h	5	—	Deviating	Compare V-09
10	V-10	ORPCPESENHSOAS	1	1.2%	87%	1.6 h	10.3 h	6	+1 · 23m 04s	Deviating	Compare V-10
11	V-11	ORPE^×2SESOAS	1	1.2%	88.2%	1.6 h	11.4 h	6	+1 · 20m 14s	Conforming	Compare V-11
12	V-12	ORPESESONHAS	1	1.2%	89.4%	1.6 h	13 h	5	—	Deviating	Compare V-12
—	Other variants (0) · 0% of cases	Activity sequence —	0	0%	100%	—	—	—	—	—

12 variants (57.1% of all variants) occur exactly once, together 14.3% of cases.

Variant distribution

Rank on a log scale against cases on a log scale, with cumulative coverage on the right axis.

Cases (log scale) Cumulative coverage (%) Variant rank (log scale) 8 variants cover 80% of cases

Variant comparison

Two variants on the same alignment columns. Colour says which side; hatching repeats it, so the diff survives greyscale.

Variant A

Variant B

A · V-01

Merged activity set

B · V-02

Merged activity set

Every alignment column, coloured by which side uses it.

In both Only in A Only in B In neither

List of changes

Side by side
Side by side	A	B	Δ

Attributes associated with each branch

These are associations measured on the log, not causes. Every rule prints the number of cases it was measured on.

Contract type `contract_type`

82 of 84 cases · 2.3% missing

Permanent33 · 39.3%
Fixed term23 · 27.4%
Intern15 · 17.9%
Contractor11 · 13.1%

Rule statements

Ranked by lift × support. Each rule is a sentence you can read aloud.

When work_location = Madrid → the case takes “Notify HR to assign a manager” in 42.5% of cases (baseline 13.1%, lift 3.24×, n = 22).
42.5% confidence 13.1% baseline 3.24× lift n = 22
When start_lead_days > 44 AND shift = Afternoon → the case takes “Track the reply” in 92% of cases (baseline 29.8%, lift 3.09×, n = 8).
92% confidence 29.8% baseline 3.09× lift n = 8
When contract_type = Intern AND docs_complete = false → the case takes “Track the reply” in 53.6% of cases (baseline 29.8%, lift 1.8×, n = 8).
53.6% confidence 29.8% baseline 1.8× lift n = 8

Decision point

Pick an exclusive choice in the map to see its branch shares and the attributes that discriminate between them.

Decision point

Branch

Send email61 · 74.4%
Track the reply10 · 12.2%
Post a handoff note6 · 7.3%
Notify HR to assign a manager5 · 6.1%
Schedule the orientation1 · 1.2%

Pick an exclusive choice in the map to see its branch shares and the attributes that discriminate between them.

Conformance against the reference model

Reference model v3, 30 Jun 2026

Fitness0.93

Precision0.81

Fitness and precision trade off; we report both rather than a single model-quality score.

Conforming cases — 37 (44%) Non-conforming — 47 (56%)

Deviations by type

A deviation is not necessarily an error — it is behaviour the reference model does not allow.

					Breaks conformance
Activity retry	28	33.3%	4m 45s	2.2 h	—
Invalid activity	47	56%	83s	65m 01s	Breaks conformance
Skip	26	31%	53s	22m 58s	Breaks conformance
Exclusive-choice violation	7	8.3%	2m 46s	19m 22s	Breaks conformance
Invalid start/end	5	6%	0s	0s	Breaks conformance

Conforming cases over the window

Conforming cases (%) · 16 Jun – 13 Jul 2026

Conforming cases (%)16 Jun – 13 Jul 2026

Rework and loops

Self-loops and loop-backs, with loop inflow, outflow and net gain.

Activity	Kind	Self-loops	Cases affected	Mean repeats	Loop in	Loop out	Net gain	Total waiting
Personalise the welcome email	Loop back	0	13	2×	13	12	+1	7.3 h
Assign the manager checklist	Self-loop	31	12	3.58×	31	28	+3	40m 25s
Send email	Loop back	0	10	2×	10	10	0	7.2 h
Schedule the orientation	Loop back	0	7	2×	7	5	+2	4.2 h
Post a handoff note	Self-loop	18	6	4×	18	14	+4	62m 20s
Schedule the orientation	Loop back	0	6	2×	6	6	0	2.6 h
Assign the manager checklist	Loop back	0	6	2×	6	5	+1	1.7 h
Send email	Self-loop	5	5	2×	5	5	0	16m 34s

Rework cost €296–444 · 8 cases · 15 h Costed at the €25/h loaded rate used everywhere in this dashboard.

Cases

Showing 16 of a 40-case sample drawn from 84 cases, across the 21 variants listed on the Variants tab. The totals above are exact; this table is sampled.

Variant				Roles	Departments		Conformance
V-01	2026-07-09 11:07:32	6.6 h	5	People Ops	onboarding	0	Conforming
V-02	2026-07-09 08:29:32	2.3 h	6	People Ops	onboarding	0	Deviating
V-01	2026-07-08 12:42:23	1.6 h	5	People Ops	onboarding	0	Conforming
V-03	2026-07-08 11:52:28	63m 05s	9	People Ops	onboarding	3	Deviating
V-07	2026-07-08 10:58:55	2.1 h	6	People Ops	onboarding	0	Deviating
V-05	2026-07-08 10:07:29	61m 03s	6	People Ops	onboarding	1	Conforming
V-01	2026-07-08 09:17:12	2.7 h	5	People Ops	onboarding	0	Conforming
V-01	2026-07-08 09:07:02	26m 15s	5	People Ops	onboarding	0	Conforming
V-19	2026-07-07 12:59:27	1.8 h	9	People Ops	onboarding	3	Deviating
V-03	2026-07-07 12:37:10	1.8 h	9	People Ops	onboarding	3	Deviating
V-03	2026-07-06 09:57:09	28m 18s	9	People Ops	onboarding	3	Deviating
V-01	2026-07-06 08:39:57	3.8 h	5	People Ops	onboarding	0	Conforming
V-02	2026-07-03 08:39:10	2.1 h	6	People Ops	onboarding	0	Deviating
V-02	2026-07-01 13:13:46	3.2 h	6	People Ops	onboarding	0	Deviating
V-02	2026-07-01 12:33:43	3 h	6	People Ops	onboarding	0	Deviating
V-01	2026-06-30 14:14:56	63m 20s	5	People Ops	onboarding	0	Conforming

16 of 40

Live 92% confidence

Automation design

The Map tab is what the event log shows. This is the automation you are designing from it.

OutlookTeamsHR portal

1.2h reclaimed / week across everyone who runs it

Case V-01 Conforming

—

· Process: New-hire welcome sequence · Correlation key employee_ref

Total duration

Working Waiting Steps · Rework

Field	Value
`employee_ref`	EMP-2026-08556
`start_date`	2026-07-01
`department`	People & HR
`contract_type`	Fixed term
`national_id`	••••••••B · masked at capture (National tax id masked at capture)

Field	Value
`employee_ref`	EMP-2026-72385
`start_date`	2026-07-10
`department`	People & HR
`contract_type`	Fixed term
`national_id`	••••••••Z · masked at capture (National tax id masked at capture)

Field	Value
`employee_ref`	EMP-2026-55974
`start_date`	2026-07-07
`department`	People & HR
`contract_type`	Fixed term
`national_id`	••••••••B · masked at capture (National tax id masked at capture)